You wear what you believe

Several of the sources attributed to Caliph Umar I or his governors mention clothing. For example, the Christians living in lands conquered by the Muslims needed to cut their hair in a special way. They also needed to wear a special belt around their waist, and could not carry weapons. The goal was to make sure that there was a distinction between Muslims and non-Muslims. The laws even say that a Christian should never look like a Muslim. However, if Umar’s rules were observed the Christians and Jews enjoyed special protection and were allowed to celebrate their own religion.

Context:

The Pact or Covenant of Umar determined the rules under which non-Muslims such as Jews and Christians could live in Muslim lands. The followers of Muhammed had conquered large parts of Arabia and the Middle East in the seventh century, lands that were inhabited by many different religions. Of these religions the Jews and Christians enjoyed a special status, as they were considered ‘people of the book’, similar to the Muslims. All three religions based themselves on a holy text revealed by a Prophet or Messiah. Although nobody knows for sure, the rules for non-Muslims were probably set by Caliph Umar I, who ruled from 634 to 644. One of the most important laws was that Christians and Jews needed to pay a special tax, called Jizya, to the Muslim government. In return for this, they received the status of Dhimmi, which means ‘people of protection’. In the following centuries, many Muslim rulers and lawyers debated about the exact meaning of the Pact of Umar and about the exact rules that applied to the Dhimmi in their lands. Interestingly, many of the sources we have attest that the Christians and the Jews imposed these rules on themselves. For example, letters to Umar and to one of his commanders state that they sought the Caliph’s protection: ‘When you [Umar] came to us [the Christians], we asked of you safety for our lives, our families and our property, and the people of our religion on these conditions.’ Those conditions mainly involved respect from the Christians towards the Muslims and the Islamic Faith, as well as a promise not to obstruct followers of Islam. In recent years, political groups have also debated the status of the Dhimmi. Some see them as oppressed people, while others see their status as a key example of religious tolerance on the part of the Muslims.

Do you feel that this was a good rule? Is it tolerant to allow people to practice their own religion as long as they look different?